Curation Policies
Home > Resource Centre > Curation Policies
Data Management Plans | Research Funders' Policies | Tools & Guidance | Events | Literature
Members of our Associates Network requested a central dissemination point to provide advice and guidance on the curation policies of UK funding bodies. In response, we created this web page. It provides core details of the main UK research funders' policies and pulls together links to useful references and tools to help researchers and institutions comply with these requirements. More detailed information is provided in an associated DCC Curation Policies Report [PDF].

Data Management Plans
In light of increased requirements being placed on researchers by UK funding bodies, we have been developing guidance and templates to assist in the completion of data management and sharing plans. Having analysed requirements, we have provided a content checklist [PDF] that draws together all details researchers may be asked to provide in such plans. This is currently being developed into an online tool to allow users to create personalised plans, by selecting relevant sections given their context or research funder, and aid completion by providing examples of best practice via a library of data management statements/options that can be adapted for each section.
An abstract of requirements by research funder is provided below. To read the detailed guidance from each funder on what should be covered in a data management plan, click here.[PDF, 53KB]
- AHRC: A technical appendix may be required, covering project management of technical aspects; data development methods; infrastructural support; data preservation and sustainability; access; and copyright and IPR issues.
- BBSRC: A data sharing plan is required, which may include details of: data areas, types and formats; standards and metadata; secondary use; methods for data sharing; and timeframes for release. Guidance is available under 'Data Sharing Areas' on p6 of the BBSRC Data Sharing Policy [external].
- EPSRC: EPSRC does not require researchers to provide a statement on data management or sharing as part of the application process.
- ESRC: ESRC require applicants to consider how outputs will be made available in the long-term at the proposal stage. Five questions [external] covering a survey of existing data, plans for archiving and potential users should be covered.
- MRC: A data sharing and preservation strategy should be provided at the proposal stage, summarising the type of data to be generated, foreseeable research uses, and plans for preparing and documenting data for preservation for sharing. Guidance is available online with the data policy [external]
- NERC: Researchers are expected to consider aspects of data creation and management prior to beginning research. Overarching data plans will be produced for each thematic programme.
- STFC: STFC does not appear to require a statement on data management or sharing.
- Wellcome Trust: Plans for data management and sharing, where necessary, should take account of five areas: data quality and standards; use of public data repositories; intellectual property; protection of research participants; and long-term preservation and sustainability. Additional guidance is available in the Trust's Q&A sheet [external] on the data policy.

Research Funders' Policies
The table below summarises the coverage of main UK research funders' policies and the support infrastructure provided. Clarifications and links to the policies and guidance are available in the sections that follow. More detailed information is available in our Curation Policies Report [PDF] and from each funding body's website.
| Key: |
|
full coverage |
|
partial coverage |
|
no coverage |
- Published outputs: a policy on published outputs e.g. journal articles and conference papers
- Data: a datasets policy or statement on access to and maintenance of electronic resources
- Time limits: set timeframes for making content accessible or preserving research outputs
- Data plan: requirement to consider data creation, management or sharing in the grant application
- Access/sharing: promotion of OA journals, deposit in repositories, data sharing or reuse
- Long-term curation: stipulations on long-term maintenance and preservation of research outputs
- Monitoring: whether compliance is monitored or action taken such as withholding funds
- Guidance: best practice guides or curation support staff available to assist funded researchers
- Repository: provision of a repository to make published research outputs accessible
- Data centre: provision of a data centre to curate unpublished electronic resources or data


Detailed policy overview by research funder
The AHRC has released a statement on open access to research outputs [external] in line with the RCUK position. The Council's policy on electronic resources [external] comprises a few clauses in the Research Funding Guide, last published November 2008 (particularly see sections on deposit of resources or datasets and self-archiving policy on p86).
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
The AHRC provides expected timeframes for data release and availability: electronic resources must remain accessible for a minimum of three years after the end of the award and deposits to the Archaeology Data Service (ADS) [external] must be made within three months of project completion.
- Data Plan
If applicants plan to create significant electronic resources, they are expected to complete a technical appendix at the proposal stage. This has six sections: project management of technical aspects; data development methods; infrastructural support; data preservation and sustainability; access; and copyright and IPR issues.
- Access/Data Sharing
The AHRC requires all research outputs to be made available in an accessible repository. Electronic resources need to remain available for at least three years.
- Long-term curation
The details required by the technical appendix cover data creation and sustainability, however there is not a specific mandate to preserve apart from in the case of archaeology, where grant holders are expected to deposit resources with the ADS.
- Monitoring
Compliance with the curation policy does not appear to be actively monitored, nor are penalties stated for failure to fulfil these requirements.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
Support and guidance for archaeology researchers is available through ADS [external], which provides assistance from the proposal stage, through creating sustainable resources to depositing them for long-term preservation. Legacy guidance materials, such as subject specific preservation handbooks [external], case studies and information papers [external] are still available through the AHDS web pages for other researchers. It should be noted these are not being updated so will lose currency.
- Repository
A publications repository is not provided by the AHRC. Researchers are expected to make use of institutional and subject-based repositories available to them.
- Data Centre
The AHRC provides a comprehensive data support service for archaeology researchers through the ADS. Such support for other researchers ceased with the end of funding for the Arts and Humanities Data Service (AHDS) in Spring 2008. The AHRC expects non-archaeology researchers to draw on other data centres and repositories to ensure continued access to research outputs for at least three years.
BBSRC has released a statement [external] on access to published research outputs, as well as an extensive Data Sharing Policy [external], which came into effect in April 2007. The Statement on Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice [external] acts as an overarching framework for these policies.
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
Publications must be deposited at the earliest opportunity and data must be made available in a timely and responsible manner. Specific scientific areas have established best practice for release of data as noted in the BBSRC Data Sharing Policy [external]. Timely release would otherwise be considered as no later than the release of main findings through publication, or three years as a general guide. Data should be maintained for 10 years after project completion.
- Data Plan
Researchers are required to submit a data sharing plan as part of the proposal. This may include details of: data areas, types and formats; standards and metadata; secondary use; methods for data sharing; and timeframes for release. Guidance on what to include is available under 'Data Sharing Areas' on p6 of the BBSRC Data Sharing Policy [external].
- Access/Data Sharing
The Council actively promotes data sharing and encourages researchers to make material openly accessible, in suitably accessible formats using established standards. A publications repository and financial support for data sharing is available to facilitate sustained access.
- Long-term curation
The coverage of the Data Sharing Policy and the Statement on Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice is testament to BBSRC's commitment to the entire lifecycle of research outputs. Researchers are expected to keep data securely for ten years after the end of a project through their institutions.
- Monitoring
Adherence to the proposed data management and sharing plan will be monitored through the final report assessment procedure and may be taken into account when assessing future proposals.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
A main point of contact for data sharing queries is provided and the Council states it will provide guidance on existing standards, guidelines, databases and resources that may be relevant.
- Repository
Repository support for publications and accompanying material is available through UK PubMed Central [external]
- Data Centre
Repository support for data is not provided, however BBSRC recognises data sharing has time and cost implications, so funding for this can be requested as part of the full economic cost of a research project. The Council also supports the European Bioinformatics Institute [external].
EPSRC has recently mandated open-access publication of research [external] that it funds. Further details will be provided shortly but for the moment the Council links through to the joint RCUK statement. The Council does not have a data policy as yet, however a few stipulations on maintaining data are made in the Guide to Good Practice in Science and Engineering Research [external]. EPSRC is currently developing policies on maintaining research outputs.
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
The only time constraint stipulated by EPSRC at present is that data should be securely stored for an appropriate time. The Council's agreement with the RCUK statement also suggests that publications should be deposited in an accessible repository at the earliest opportunity, preferably at or around the time of publication.
- Data Plan
EPSRC does not require researchers to provide a statement on data management or sharing as part of the application process.
- Access/Data Sharing
EPSRC is 'strongly committed to the principles outlined in the RCUK position statement on access to research outputs' and expects its funded researchers to make publications [external] available. According to research conducted by the RIN, the Council considers that the discipline areas it covers do not have so much need for data sharing, and that in most cases a journal publication summarising results is sufficient without providing access to the original dataset. (See p61 in Research Funders Policies for the management of information outputs [external].) The position with respect to data sharing may be revised in the planned data policy.
- Long-term curation
No stipulations are made regarding long-term curation of research outputs, aside from a principle of good scientific practice being to securely store primary data for an 'appropriate' period. The fact that much of the data the Council funds could potentially be recreated in the future may underlie this current position.
- Monitoring
Adherence with EPSRC's curation requirements does not appear to be monitored.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
As the EPSRC's policy regarding information outputs is minimal, little guidance or support appears to be offered by the Council.
- Repository
No repository support is provided for publications or data. It is expected researchers will utilise the institutional or subject-based repositories available to them.
- Data Centre
The responsibility to securely store data falls to the institution awarded the grant, however EPSRC does provide support to the European Bioinformatics Institute [external] so bioinformatics data could be added to community resources maintained there.
The ESRC has released a statement on open access of published research [external] and the current datasets policy is incorporated as an appendix in the Research Funding Guide [external]. The original, more extensive Data Policy [external] is currently under review, and will apparently be widened in scope to include more than data under the new title Research Resources Policy.
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
Grant holders are expected to deposit publications in the ESRC Social Sciences Repository at the earliest opportunity and data must be offered to the ESDS based at the UKDA within three months of the end of the award.
- Data Plan
ESRC require applicants to consider what outputs will be created at the proposal stage and how these will be made available in the long-term. Five questions [external] covering a survey of existing data, plans for archiving and potential users should be covered.
- Access/Data Sharing
Researchers are expected to make all outputs accessible as soon as possible. ESRC provides a publications repository and data service to facilitate this.
- Long-term curation
The Council's commitment to long-term curation is displayed through the repository and data services it supports. Researchers are expected to seek guidance and follow best practice to ensure outputs are created and maintained appropriately.
- Monitoring
ESRC states it will monitor compliance with its policies. The final payment of a grant will be withheld if data has not been deposited to the required standard, unless a waiver of deposit has been agreed in advance.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
The ESRC offer extensive support to researchers creating digital records, via the ESDS. ESDS staff will assist from the application process, throughout the project to final deposit and reuse. Various guides [external] are available through its data centre and a helpdesk is run.
- Repository
The ESRC runs a Social Sciences Repository [external] to record various awards and outputs and provide a place for grant holders to deposit their publications.
- Data Centre
Time can be set aside within the grant and funding requested for the preparation of data for deposit. Data will be preserved in the long-term by the UKDA [external].
The MRC has released a position statement [external] in support of open and unrestricted access to published research in line with the RCUK position. It also has a brief policy [external] on data sharing and preservation. Detailed guidance on how to plan, conduct and record research is available through the Council's Good Research Practice guide. [external]
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
The MRC expects publications to be made openly accessible as soon as possible and in any event within six months of the journal publisher's official date of final publication. Data should be made available in a timely and responsible manner, and securely maintained for a minimum of ten years after completion of the research. A limited defined period of exclusive use of data for primary research is reasonable.
- Data Plan
Applicants are expected to consider the future of their resources at the proposal stage through completion of a data sharing and preservation strategy. This should include a summary of the type of data to be generated, foreseeable research uses, and plans for preparing and documenting data for preservation for sharing. Applicants requesting funds to extend existing data sets should also explain how this adds value and how sharing would provide opportunities for coordination or collaboration. Guidance on what to include in the plan is available online with the data policy [external] and in a FAQ produced with the DCC.
- Access/Data Sharing
The MRC is a clear proponent of the open access and data sharing movement. It expects publications to be made available promptly and encourages researchers to make data available with as few restrictions as possible.
- Long-term curation
Stipulations on long-term curation and preservation of research outputs are made in the data policy and Good Research Practice guide [external]. Recommendations are provided on gathering, recording and storing the data.
- Monitoring
It does not appear compliance with MRC's open access or data sharing policies is monitored as yet.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
The MRC is provides support to researchers through data sharing toolkits and best practice guides [external]. A data support service is also being developed at present.
- Repository
Researchers are provided with the UK PubMed Central repository [external] as a means to provide centralised access to their published research.
- Data Centre
The MRC encourages curation and long-term management of its research outputs and will provide funds for preservation. The onus is on the Principal Investigator and his/her institution as a supporting preservation infrastructure is not yet offered, though a data support service is in development. The MRC also provides support for EBI [external].
NERC has released a position statement [external] on access to published research. As with the other research councils, this is in line with the RCUK statement. NERC also has an extensive data policy [external], which is currently under review.
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
Publications resulting from NERC funding must be deposited at the earliest opportunity and data must be offered after a 'reasonable period' of exclusive use.
- Data Plan
Researchers are expected to consider aspects of data creation and management prior to beginning research. A data plan should describe the dataset to be created and related documentation, establish intellectual ownership, and consider how the data will be stored, backed up, archived, accessed and reused. Roles and responsibilities for each stage of the lifecycle should also be assigned. Overarching data plans will be produced for each thematic programme along the lines of the British Atmospheric Data Centre's Data Management Plans - What They Should Contain template [PDF].
- Access/Data Sharing
Publications and data must be made accessible through repositories and NERC's data centres. Minimum quality standards are enforced to ensure data can be reused and understood by third parties.
- Long-term curation
Long-term curation is central to NERC and an extensive support infrastructure [external] is in place to facilitate this.
- Monitoring
Compliance with the policy on publications may be considered in future applications. Note is not made of whether compliance with the data policy will be checked.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
Guidance for researchers on data creation and management is provided through the specialist data centres.
- Repository
To improve access to published outputs, NERC has established a centralised e-print research repository [external].
- Data Centre
The NERC data centres support long-term curation of environmental data holdings. Access to all NERC funded data is facilitated through an integrated, searchable catalogue [external].
A statement on access to published research outputs is available within STFC's Research Grants Handbook [external]. As yet, no formal data policy has been produced by the Council, though a degree of curation appears to continue through channels established by CCLRC and PPARC.
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
Researchers are expected to make publications that stem from STFC-funded research available at the earliest opportunity. No time limits are specified for data.
- Data Plan
STFC does not appear to require a statement on data management or sharing. Plans that formalise ownership and agree distribution mechanisms were required by PPARC at the proposal stage, however it is unclear to what extent this is still required.
- Access/Data Sharing
Researchers are expected to make published outputs accessible. Data produced by STFC-funded researchers is often made available, however a formal requirement to do so does not appear to be in place.
- Long-term curation
The Council does not have a formal policy covering long-term curation at present, however the recently released strategy consultation document [external] notes it is a priority to continue maintaining appropriate data stores (see section 2.4.1.6, p44), showing a commitment to sustained access.
- Monitoring
It is not clear whether compliance with STFC's open access policy will be monitored
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
Best practice guides for researchers creating and maintaining digital material were not found on the STFC website, though some assistance may be provided informally through the data centres.
- Repository
An e-Publications archive [external] is run by the Council to collate and make its published research accessible.
- Data Centre
Several data centres and research portals are in place for unpublished research and data, such as the UK Solar System Data Centre, the Chemical Database Service and the Diamond Data Portal. These are generally organised on a subject basis rather than serving the outputs of the whole council, and it seems deposit is ad hoc.
The Wellcome Trust has both a statement on open access of research outputs [external] and a brief policy regarding data management and sharing [external]. A very thorough Q&A [external] on how to comply with the data policy is also provided. The Trust's Guidelines on Good Research Practice [external] provide details of the standards of research conduct expected of funded researchers.
POLICY STIPULATIONS
- Time Limits
Certain time limits are stipulated for both publications and research data. Published outputs should be deposited as soon as possible, and in any event within six months of final publication. As an absolute minimum, researchers should make relevant data available to others on publication of their research however opportunities for timely and responsible pre-publication sharing of data should also be maximised. Research institutions are also required to maintain data securely for a minimum of ten years.
- Data Plan
Researchers are required to submit a plan for data management and sharing in cases where a resource of benefit to the research community is planned, or a significant quantity of data that could potentially be shared is likely to be generated. The guidance indicates that these plans should, where relevant to the proposed research, take account of five areas: data quality and standards; use of public data repositories; intellectual property; protection of research participants; and long-term preservation and sustainability. Additional guidance on what to include is available in the Trust's Q&A sheet [external] on the data policy.
- Access/Data Sharing
The Wellcome Trust actively promotes open access to research publications resulting from its funded research. The Trust provides additional funding to institutions to cover open access charges and requires researchers make publications available through PubMed Central and UK PubMed Central. Researchers are also expected to maximise the availability of research data with as few restrictions as possible.
- Long-term curation
The Trust's Guidelines on Good Research Practice [external] encourage appropriate creation and maintenance of research resources. Institutions are expected to have guidelines setting out responsibilities and procedures for the appropriate storage and disposal of data and samples.
- Monitoring
Compliance with the open access policy on published research outputs is monitored, as is access to major resources. The Trust does not actively monitor data sharing on grants across the board.
SUPPORT SERVICES
- Guidance
The Wellcome Trust has provided an excellent guide on how to comply with its data policy [external], but does not appear to have made many other sources of guidance or best practice available to assist researchers in creating high quality and reusable data.
- Repository
A repository for published research outputs is provided through UK PubMed Central [external].
- Data Centre
As yet no data curation facilities are provided. Responsibility here falls to the institutions in which Wellcome Trust funded researchers are based. The Trust also supports the European Bioinformatics Institute [external].
Cross-Council policy overview
Published Outputs
The research funders' policies on published outputs are aligned with the joint RCUK position statement [external] which was first issued in June 2005. All advocate open access to outputs from their funded research programmes and many provide a repository service in support of this requirement. There are differences regarding how publications fees should be met, and some funders include additional stipulations — NERC, for example, may take compliance with this policy into account when considering further applications for funding.
Data
Most of the research funders noted above have some form of policy regarding data, however the extent and coverage of these vary greatly. In several cases researchers are directed to good practice guides, which provide recommendations on documenting and maintaining research. There are only two Research Councils without a formal policy as yet — the EPSRC and STFC — though a data policy is currently being developed at EPSRC and STFC appears to continue CCLRC and PPARC curation procedures.
Time Limits
The timeframes stipulated for access and curation vary by funding body. Most expect publications to be made openly available as soon as possible or in a timely manner, which is generally understood to be at least within six months of publication of results. The ESRC and AHDS (only in the case of archaeology) expect an offer of data within three months of the end of the award, and also advocate a relationship with the data centre from the outset of the project. The BBSRC, MRC and Wellcome Trust have a general statement that data must be kept securely for a period of ten years after the completion of a research project, while the EPSRC maintains it should be held for an 'appropriate' length of time.
Data Plan
Most research funders require applicants to submit a statement on access, management and long-term curation of their research outputs at the proposal stage. The focus of this statement varies by funder: the AHRC, ESRC and NERC all require a statement on how resources will be created so they are sustainable for the long-term, while the BBSRC, MRC and Wellcome Trust focus heavily on the data sharing potential of research resources. Neither the EPSRC nor STFC currently require applicants to submit data sharing and curation plans as part of the proposal, however this is likely to change as data policies emerge.
Access/Data Sharing
All funders have signed up to the RCUK statement on open access of research outputs [external] and advocate making publications widely accessible. They largely agree to meet publication fees, normally as indirect costs, to ensure research is freely accessible. The MRC and Wellcome Trust also encourage, or in cases where they have paid publication fees, require licences that allow articles to be freely copied and reused for purposes such as text and data mining. Some moves are also being made towards linking publications with source data. UK PubMed Central [external], for example, will allow deposit of supplemental material in support of the publication.
The concept of open data is not advocated in any of the policies considered, however the BBSRC, MRC and Wellcome Trust push strongly for data sharing, expecting data to be made available with as few restrictions as possible. The ESRC [external] and NERC [external] facilitate data sharing through their funded data centres, however licence fees and access restrictions are often applied as their remit is to serve research and teaching communities. The AHRC provides access to, and a cross-search of, their funded archaeology data through the Archaeology Data Service [external] and requires other award holders to keep data accessible for a minimum of three years. The STFC has not provided a clear statement on expectations with regard to data sharing. According to a RIN study [external] the EPSRC considers the discipline areas it covers do not have so much need for data sharing, however the policy that is currently being developed may revise this position.
Long-term Curation
Most of the funders consider curation in detail in their policies. The AHRC, BBSRC, ESRC, MRC, NERC and Wellcome Trust all consider various aspects of the curation lifecycle, emphasising for example the need to create resources according to appropriate standards and best practice, maintain adequate documentation and metadata to ensure usability, and manage data appropriately in the short-term so it can be preserved in the longer-term, which is generally noted as 10 years or more by the funders. The EPSRC only has one stipulation — that data be appropriately stored for a minimum of 10 years — while the STFC does not appear to have any formal requirements addressing curation at present.
Monitoring
NERC and the Wellcome Trust note they monitor compliance with the open access policy on publications. The BBSRC will monitor adherence to the data management and sharing plan and may take this into consideration for future proposals, while the ESRC could withhold the final grant payment if data is not deposited on time. The extent to which such penalties are applied is unclear. The other funders meanwhile do not appear to monitor adherence or impose penalties for non-compliance with their curation policies.
Guidance
The extent to which guidance and support services are provided varies significantly. The best served researchers are those funded by the ESRC, which provides extensive curation guidance through the UK Data Archive arm of the ESDS [external] and NERC, whose data centre staff will provide assistance and advice throughout the award. The AHRC [external] runs a similar service for archaeology researchers and has legacy guides [external] online for researchers in other fields. The MRC meanwhile is setting up a data support service and already provides some best practice guides and data sharing toolkits. BBSRC does not appear to have much guidance online, but does state in its policy that information on relevant standards and best practice will be provided. No particular sources of guidance were noted by the EPSRC, STFC and Wellcome Trust in their policies or found on their websites. It may be that curation support is offered less formally by these funding bodies.
Repository
Most research funders provide a publications repository for their funded researchers. ESRC, NERC and STFC all run their own services while BBSRC, the MRC and Wellcome Trust are partners in PubMed Central [external]. The only Councils that do not provide a repository for published outputs are the AHRC and EPSRC. Researchers supported by these Councils are expected to use any institutional or subject based repositories available to them.
Data Centre
Provision of data centres is patchy - very few funding bodies have a full service in place to support researchers. The exceptions are the ESRC and NERC, which both provide comprehensive preservation and support services through the ESDS [external] and NERC [external] data centres. The BBSRC, MRC and Wellcome Trust meanwhile agree the cost of long-term curation can be included in the original proposal. The AHRC provides a data service for researchers in the area of archaeology through ADS [external] and it appears STFC have several services and agreements with other Councils to provide pockets of support, for example through NERC and services such as the UK Solar System Data Centre [external]. The Wellcome Trust, BBSRC, MRC and EPSRC all contribute to the European Bioinformatics Institute [external]. For research that falls outside the EBI remit the institutions in which funded researchers are based are expected to maintain outputs in the long-term.

Tools & Guidance
The following tools and services are available:
- AHDS guides [external]
information papers, case studies and best practice for digital resources in the arts and humanities
- AHDS preservation handbooks [external]
technical handbooks identifying significant properties of different data types and preservation instruction, based the migration approach used by AHDS
- Australian National University data management advice [external]
a site providing details of training provided by ANU based on the very comprehensive data management manual [external]
- DCC Data Management Plan Content Checklist
a
draft content checklist intended to act as an aide when producing data management plans as part of new research projects. Following consultation this document will be developed into a working template into which researchers can insert their own information. An interactive, web-based tool is also planned, which will allow researchers to customise the template and view and adapt examples of best practice from a library of data management statements/options for each section.
- ESDS guidance [external]
details of how to create, document, store, manage and share data
- ICPSR Guide to Social Science Data Preparation and Archiving [external]
a compilation of best practice aimed at those engaged in the cycle of research, from applying for a research grant, through data collection phase to preparation of the data for deposit in a public archive
- JISC preservation policy advice [external]
a brief guide from JISC digital media on how to establish a digital preservation policy
- MIT data management advice [external]
a collection of guidance and resources put together by MIT Libraries
- OpenDOAR [external]
a directory of open access repositories worldwide
- OpenDOAR policy tool [external]
a tool to help administrators formulate and/or present their repository's policies
- RELU data support service [external]
data management guidance aimed at researchers funded under the cross-council Rural and Economic Land Use (RELU) Programme
- Repositories Support Project policy pages [external]
general guidance on policy and legal issues related to repositories
- Repository policy briefing paper [external]
an RSP briefing paper that identifies the benefits of a comprehensive policy framework and explores the different types of policy that a repository should develop
- RoMEO [external]
a registry of publishers' copyright & self-archiving policies, colour-coded and mapped against funding body requirements for ease of reference
- Science Commons addendum engine [external]
a tool to generate a PDF form that you can attach to a journal publisher's copyright agreement to ensure that you retain certain rights
- UKDA data management and sharing advice [external]
a suite of web pages to provide data creators, data managers and data curators with best practice strategies and methods for creating, preparing and storing shareable datasets
In addition to the DCC Data Management Plan Content Checklist we are developing further templates for you to download and customise.

Events

Literature
- Beagrie, Neil et al, Digital preservation policies study [external], (2008)
This study responds to the lack of institutional level curation policies across the HE sector by providing a framework for those planning to create such policies, together with a series of mappings to core university business drivers so preservation policies can be embedded in wider aims.
- Gibbs, Harry et al, DISC-UK DataShare: State-of-the-Art Review [external], (2007)
A data sharing review that considers funder requirements, barrier and benefits to sharing, and current practices.
- Green, Ann, Macdonald, Stuart & Rice, Robin, Policy-making for Research Data in Repositories: A Guide [external], (2009)
A decision-making and planning tool for institutions with digital repositories in existence or in development that are considering adding research data to their digital collections.
- Jones, Sarah, A report on the range of policies required for and related to digital curation, (2009)
A detailed report on the curation policy and data management plan requirements of main UK research funders on which this web page is based. The report also maps requirements against existing institutional provision to identify gaps.
- Lyon, Liz, Dealing with Data: Roles, Rights, Responsibilities and Relationships [external], (2007)
This strategic report investigates how data is currently being curated across the UK. Policies related to data curation are referenced throughout and a section of the synthesis and discussion focuses specifically on policy and planning.
- RIN, Research funders' policies for the management of information outputs [external], (2007)
This study investigates the policy and practice of UK research funders in managing their research outputs. It compares policies across the Research Councils and other funding bodies by the type of output, such as journal articles, books and data.
- RIN, Stewardship of digital research data: a framework of principles and guidelines [external], (2008)
The RIN framework synthesises the RCUK statement on access to research and OECD principles to avoid inconsistencies and duplication. Five core principles for effective stewardship are asserted.
- Ruusalepp, Raivo, A comparative study of international approaches to enabling the sharing of research data (2008)
A DCC and JISC report that compares policies, strategies, infrastructure and services for sharing research data across OECD member countries.
- RCUK, Policy and Code of Conduct on the Governance of Good Research
Conduct [external], (2009)
The Code aims to provide clear guidelines to help researchers and
research organisations achieve the highest standards possible when
carrying out research. It notes that data should normally be preserved
and accessible for ten years, but for projects of clinical or major
social, environmental or heritage importance, for 20 years or longer.
