Principles for Enabling Access to Engineering Design Information Through Life – Building Curation into the Records
The ability to support products (be they artefacts or services) over extended lifecycles is to a great extent dependent upon the ability to maintain complete records of the design, manufacture and ultimately operation of such products.
This task is, in essence, one of curation, where efforts must be expended in ensuring that these records are managed in such a manner that their original content and intent are clear to subsequent users of each entity within the record.
In order to achieve this, it is essential that these records are constructed in such a manner as to adequately capture required detail and ensure these remain accessible and comprehensible to future users, many of whom would be uninvolved in its generation.
A £5 million research project, KIM, was tasked with investigating this topic. A number of key conclusions were drawn from the complementary but eclectic work conducted during the project, each of which emerged from different domains and different aspects of the design process.
In order to provide a single, coherent set of recommendations for users and developers of design representation tools, a set of principles has been established by synthesis of these conclusions. This chapter aims to convey these principles and to make clear their provenance.
Key points
- Information should be created, retained and recorded only if necessary.
- Information should be recorded in a storable information object at a granularity appropriate for use and re-use.
- Information should be given a unique, persistent identifier.
- Information objects should not be duplicated where a dynamic link or explicit reference can be used instead.
- Information objects should be tailored to achieve their intended goals.
- Information objects should be created with potential future re-use in mind.
- The value of an information object should be assessed throughout its life from creation to disposal.
- Information objects and their annotations should be created systematically and represented in a way amenable to perpetual re-use.
- Methods and procedures for information handling should systematic, unambiguous and reliable.
- Corpora of information objects should be used as a resource for reflective learning and discovery.
- Information management is too important to be left to arise ad hoc; it should be designed explicitly to meet the needs of the organisation.
- Home
- Digital curation
- About us
- News
- Events
- Resources
- Briefing Papers
- Introduction to Curation
- Annotation
- Appraisal and Selection
- Curating Emails
- Curating e-Science Data
- Curating Geospatial Data
- Data Accreditation
- Data Citation and Linking
- Data Protection
- Database Archiving
- Digital Repositories
- Freedom of Information
- Genre Classification
- Interoperability
- Persistent Identifiers
- Trust Through Self Assessment
- Using OAIS for Curation
- Web 2.0
- What is Digital Curation?
- Common Directions in Research Data Policy
- 5 Steps to Research Data Readiness
- Citizen Science
- Making the Case for RDM
- Legal Watch Papers
- Standards Watch Papers
- Technology Watch Papers
- Introduction to Curation
- How-to Guides & Checklists
- Appraise & Select Research Data for Curation
- Cite Datasets and Link to Publications
- Develop RDM Services
- Develop a DMP
- Discover Requirements
- Five Steps to Decide What Data to Keep
- Five Things You Need to Know About RDM and the Law
- License Research Data
- Track Data Impact with Metrics
- Using RISE
- Where to keep research data
- Write a Lay Summary
- Developing RDM Services
- Reviewing research data platform capabilities at CISER
- Using EPrints to Build a Repository for UEL
- Assigning DOIs at Bristol
- DMPs in the Arts and Humanities
- Improving RDM at Monash
- Improving Research Visibility
- Increasing Participation in Training
- RDM Training for Librarians
- RDM strategy: moving from plans to action
- Storing and Sharing Data in Hull
- Curation Lifecycle Model
- Curation Reference Manual
- Peer review
- Editorial Board
- Completed chapters
- Appraisal and Selection
- Archival Metadata
- Archiving Web Resources
- Automated Metadata Generation
- Curating Emails
- File Formats
- Investment in an Intangible Asset
- Learning Object Metadata
- Metadata
- Ontologies
- Open Source for Digital Curation
- Preservation Metadata
- Preservation Scenarios for Projects Producing Digital Resources
- Preservation Strategies
- Principles for Enabling Access to Engineering Design Information Through Life
- Scientific Metadata
- The Role of Microfilm in Digital Preservation
- Chapters in production
- Policy and legal
- Data Management Plans
- Tools
- Case studies
- Repository audit and assessment
- Standards
- Publications and presentations
- Roles
- Curation journals
- Informatics research
- External resources
- Online Store
- Briefing Papers
- Training
- Projects
- Community
- Tailored support
In this section
- Briefing Papers
- How-to Guides & Checklists
- Developing RDM Services
- Curation Lifecycle Model
- Curation Reference Manual
- Peer review
- Editorial Board
- Completed chapters
- Appraisal and Selection
- Archival Metadata
- Archiving Web Resources
- Automated Metadata Generation
- Curating Emails
- File Formats
- Investment in an Intangible Asset
- Learning Object Metadata
- Metadata
- Ontologies
- Open Source for Digital Curation
- Preservation Metadata
- Preservation Scenarios for Projects Producing Digital Resources
- Preservation Strategies
- Principles for Enabling Access to Engineering Design Information Through Life
- Scientific Metadata
- The Role of Microfilm in Digital Preservation
- Chapters in production
- Policy and legal
- Data Management Plans
- Tools
- Case studies
- Repository audit and assessment
- Standards
- Publications and presentations
- Roles
- Curation journals
- Informatics research
- External resources
- Online Store
