IETF Matching of Language Tags
Just to let you know, we are no longer updating this section.
This is retained as a resource but nothing new has been added since late 2009. No further additions will be made by the DCC.
This is retained as a resource but nothing new has been added since late 2009. No further additions will be made by the DCC.
Date added 10 August 2009
Last edited 12 November 2009
Full Title
IETF Matching of Language Tags
Description
IETF Matching of Language Tags describes a syntax, for matching language tags to a user„s preference list. It defines two matching methodologies; filtering and lookup. Implementations include language negotiation or content selection.
Standards Developing Organisation
- IETF
- Internet Engineering Task Force
Rights
No information available
Lifecycle Actions
- Access, Use and Reuse
- Description and Representation Information
Standard Framework
- Digital Archive Standards
Standard Type
- Metadata Content Standards
Current Version
Further Information
- Wikipedia entry on IETF Language Tags [external]
Alternative Current Versions
None.
Previous Versions
- March 1995 - IETF RFC 1766: Tags for the Identification of Languages [external]
- Superseded
- January 2001 - IETF RFC 3066: Tags for the Identification of Languages [external]
- Superseded by IETF RFC 4646 AND IETF 4647
Referenced Standards
- Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0: 2004
- IETF RFC 1766: March 1995, Tags for the Identification of Languages
- IETF RFC 2119: March 1997, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
- IETF RFC 2277: January 1998, IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages
- IETF RFC 2616 errata: October 2004, HTTP/1.1 Specification Errata
- IETF RFC 2616: June 1999, Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1
- IETF RFC 3066: January 2001, Tags for the Identification of Languages
- IETF RFC 3282: May 2002, Content Language Headers
- IETF RFC 4234: October 2005, Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF
- IETF RFC 4646: September 2006, Tags for Identifying Languages
- Home
- Digital curation
- About us
- News
- Events
- Resources
- Briefing Papers
- Introduction to Curation
- Annotation
- Appraisal and Selection
- Curating Emails
- Curating e-Science Data
- Curating Geospatial Data
- Data Accreditation
- Data Citation and Linking
- Data Protection
- Database Archiving
- Digital Repositories
- Freedom of Information
- Genre Classification
- Interoperability
- Persistent Identifiers
- Trust Through Self Assessment
- Using OAIS for Curation
- Web 2.0
- What is Digital Curation?
- Common Directions in Research Data Policy
- 5 Steps to Research Data Readiness
- Citizen Science
- Making the Case for RDM
- Legal Watch Papers
- Standards Watch Papers
- Technology Watch Papers
- Introduction to Curation
- How-to Guides & Checklists
- Appraise & Select Research Data for Curation
- Cite Datasets and Link to Publications
- Develop RDM Services
- Develop a DMP
- Discover Requirements
- Five Steps to Decide What Data to Keep
- Five Things You Need to Know About RDM and the Law
- License Research Data
- Track Data Impact with Metrics
- Using RISE
- Where to keep research data
- Write a Lay Summary
- Developing RDM Services
- Reviewing research data platform capabilities at CISER
- Using EPrints to Build a Repository for UEL
- Assigning DOIs at Bristol
- DMPs in the Arts and Humanities
- Improving RDM at Monash
- Improving Research Visibility
- Increasing Participation in Training
- RDM Training for Librarians
- RDM strategy: moving from plans to action
- Storing and Sharing Data in Hull
- Curation Lifecycle Model
- Curation Reference Manual
- Peer review
- Editorial Board
- Completed chapters
- Appraisal and Selection
- Archival Metadata
- Archiving Web Resources
- Automated Metadata Generation
- Curating Emails
- File Formats
- Investment in an Intangible Asset
- Learning Object Metadata
- Metadata
- Ontologies
- Open Source for Digital Curation
- Preservation Metadata
- Preservation Scenarios for Projects Producing Digital Resources
- Preservation Strategies
- Principles for Enabling Access to Engineering Design Information Through Life
- Scientific Metadata
- The Role of Microfilm in Digital Preservation
- Chapters in production
- Policy and legal
- Data Management Plans
- Tools
- Case studies
- Repository audit and assessment
- Standards
- Publications and presentations
- Roles
- Curation journals
- Informatics research
- External resources
- Online Store
- Briefing Papers
- Training
- Projects
- Community
- Tailored support
In this section
- Briefing Papers
- How-to Guides & Checklists
- Developing RDM Services
- Curation Lifecycle Model
- Curation Reference Manual
- Policy and legal
- Data Management Plans
- Tools
- Case studies
- Repository audit and assessment
- Standards
- Publications and presentations
- Roles
- Curation journals
- Informatics research
- External resources
- Online Store
Disciplinary Metadata
Disciplinary Metadata
The issue of disciplinary metadata standards - what they are, who's using them, how to use them - has been gaining attention in the RDM community. To support this, we have created a Disciplinary Metadata page for those who need help figuring out what standards might address their own needs.
