Incentivising data sharing
The theme for #rdmf7 was incentivising data management and sharing. We had an impressive line up of speakers, matched by an equally exciting and engaged audience.
Mark Thorley gave an great keynote to get us started. He argued that there are lots of small problems stacked up that need to be overcome and that these centre on people and relationships. It’s often a matter of human issues rather than technical challenges.
Cameron Neylon meanwhile made the case that impact is all about reuse. He argued that researchers are willing to share data and often do insanely difficult things to achieve this when the right rewards are in place. He also recommended people try out total-impact.org which looks great.
Lots of practical examples were given from funder, information professional and researcher perspectives. The Malaria Altlas Project in particular gave great examples of how they’ve encouraged and facilitated data sharing.
Several interesting propositions emerged in discussion:
- Adopt a multi-level curation model where some things get basic storage & preservation (e.g. data needed for validation) and others get higher degrees of curation to add value (e.g. those with the most re-use potential)
- HEIs to maintain a register of what data they own and where it is held to keep control in the mixed environment of disciplinary/institutional data centres
- Develop a ‘Data Seal of Approval’ for institutional/departmental RDM
- Include a field for funders in metadata so they can track research outputs more easily and not rely on researchers / ROs informing them
- Add a component to DMP Online to estimate RDM costs. NERC is interested in collaborating with us on this.
Lots for DCC and others to be working on!
There’s no magic formula or simple steps to take, but based on all the presentations and discussion it seems that:
if you work with people and give them the right rewards, more data will be shared
Suggest themes you’d like to see addressed at the next RDMF in the comments!
Front page image: 'Sharing' by furiousgeorge81. CC-BY-NC-ND
- Home
- Digital curation
- About us
- News
- Events
- Resources
- Briefing Papers
- Introduction to Curation
- Annotation
- Appraisal and Selection
- Curating Emails
- Curating e-Science Data
- Curating Geospatial Data
- Data Accreditation
- Data Citation and Linking
- Data Protection
- Database Archiving
- Digital Repositories
- Freedom of Information
- Genre Classification
- Interoperability
- Persistent Identifiers
- Trust Through Self Audit
- Using OAIS for Curation
- Web 2.0
- What is Digital Curation?
- Making the Case for RDM
- Research Data Readiness
- Legal Watch Papers
- Standards Watch Papers
- Technology Watch Papers
- Introduction to Curation
- How-to Guides
- Curation Reference Manual
- Peer review
- Editorial Board
- Completed chapters
- Appraisal and Selection
- Archival Metadata
- Archiving Web Resources
- Curating Emails
- File Formats
- Investment in an Intangible Asset
- Learning Object Metadata
- Metadata
- Ontologies
- Open Source for Digital Curation
- Preservation Metadata
- Preservation Strategies
- Principles for Enabling Access to Engineering Design Information Through Life
- Chapters in production
- Curation Lifecycle Model
- Policy and legal
- Data Management Plans
- Tools
- Case studies
- Repository audit and assessment
- Standards
- Publications and presentations
- Roles
- Curation journals
- Informatics research
- External resources
- Briefing Papers
- Training
- Projects
- Community
